I have been meaning to blog for some time on what we can
learn in the workplace arena from reality TV. The post by @NickWAllen on “What
crazy chef – Gordon Ramsay – has taught me about online marketing” finally
persuaded me to put pen to paper (or more accurately put fingers to keypad).
So we might as well start with the ineffable (or is it f’in-able)
Gordon Ramsay. His Kitchen Nightmares
programme has been relegated from UK restaurants to those struggling in the
USA. Regular viewers will spot the tried and tested formula of these shows.
Chef Ramsay visits a dysfunctional restaurant run by a dysfunctional family, he
dislikes the food and the décor regardless, he gets the owners to admit blame, and
then he rewards them with a restaurant makeover, new menu and free publicity.
What is done well in KitchenNightmares USA is that Ramsay (backed up by his hidden research team of course) identifies and clearly demonstrates the key issues affecting the business. His authority and experience in the same business as the restaurant owners allows him to challenge them directly. Ramsay gains respect (and offers leadership) through both his knowledge and hands-on actions. I don’t quite understand why he has to challenge people so vehemently and unpleasantly (I suspect he was bullied as a child!), but I applaud that he challenges openly with both staff and owners. Ultimately, Ramsay is a facilitator of change and the restaurant is just a back-drop – it could equally be any workplace. His approach is directly in line with the Kübler-Rossmodel – he identifies and communicates the problem, deals with the denial, gains acceptance of the problem, encourages the restaurant staff to take ownership of the problem, and then gets the staff to participate in developing the solution, and continue to do so after he has left.
The title of this blog refers to the show I’m a Celebrity … Get Me Out of Here.
This is a reality TV show in which minor has-been B-list (or Z-list) celebrities spend time
in the jungle being subjected to hours of tedium punctuated by overly-contrived
and degrading tasks such as eating bugs covered in slime. The winners are usually those who
have gained favour with the audience. The winners tend to be genuine, friendly,
hands-on, positive, motivated, entertaining/funny, honest etc. The candidates
with an agenda or ones who “talk behind other's backs” tend to be found out and
voted off. @dougshaw1 gave a great presentation on being yourself at work at
last year’s Workplace Trends, and I’m a Celebrity
is analogous to his message.
I’m also a fan of The Apprentice, and even more of a fan of the after-show The Apprentice: You’re Fired.
Obviously the relationship between this programme and workplace is more direct
with lots of lessons learned. But for me there are two key ones: 1) if you
intend to work for a megalomaniac first find out what drives them and what they
are looking for, and 2) don’t get fired before you even have a contract of
employment with them. I would like to say that The Apprentice is a great example of how team/group dynamics work,
but it is such an artificial situation (kettled egomaniacs) that it does not apply to real life. Personally
I am not convinced that risking global humiliation is worth the potential reward
of working with Alan Sugar, but perhaps I am not as confident or as
thick-skinned as the candidates. After watching Tuesday’s episode of The Apprentice my 10 year old son asked
me “What is the difference between Kermit the Frog and Tim (the one fired)?” After admitting I did not
know, my son replied “Kermit is green and Tim is a muppet”.
The TV channels (especially once you get above Channel 4)
are littered with reality TV shows. Alas I don’t watch them (or won’t admit to
it here) so please comment below on the reality TV hows that you know of that have lessons directly
relevant to workplace.
Thanks for the mention of Workplace Trends - check out this year's programme at www.workplacetrends.co.uk
ReplyDeleteBig Brother? By putting people all in the same place does not mean that they will automatically interact, collaborate, innovate, work together, share knowledge, or even get on.
ReplyDeleteMark I agree, perhaps someone should mention that to Merrisa Mayer. I recall that Big Brother started as a social experiment in the Netherlands. It reminds me of Zimardo's (1971) Stanford Prison experiment.
ReplyDelete